ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 5:  Patrice Lacheney - FRA

Ranking Index = 2.33
 EIAC 2026, LRDV, 18.09.26-26.09.26
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Intermediate - Power, Programme 1: Free Known
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
Post-FPS Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi Nmbr JrawNrm/FPS JdgRnk Diff
1 Mihnea Istrate - ROU 9.0 8.5 8.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 8.5 7.0 9.0 0 1924.00 2 -1
    Extra 300L YR-EWE 8.50 8.28 7.89 8.71 8.14 7.93 7.64 9.50 8.83 7.19 9.04   1869.93    
2 Octavian Stavila - ROU 9.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.0 8.0 10.0 8.0 7.5 9.5 0 1943.98 1 +1
    Extra 330SC YR-EXC 8.50 7.69 8.54 8.71 8.82 7.93 7.64 9.50 8.12 7.76 9.59   1861.69    
3 Lucian Dragus - ROU 9.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.5 8.0 6.0 9.0 0 1838.14 4 -1
    Extra 330SC YR-EXB 8.50 7.69 7.23 8.05 8.14 7.59 7.64 9.06 8.12 6.04 9.04   1855.06    
4 Mircea Olteanu - ROU 9.0 8.0 8.5 7.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 8.0 5.0 9.0 0 1805.47 5 -1
    Extra 300L YR-EWF 8.50 7.69 8.54 7.39 6.95 7.59 7.64 8.61 8.12 4.90 9.04   1845.81    
5 Maksym Grabarczyk - POL 8.5 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.5 0 1802.86 6 -1
    Extra 330SC SP-MTD 8.03 7.10 8.05 6.79 7.89 8.33 7.93 7.64 8.12 6.83 8.50   1841.57    
6 Madalin Girbea - ROU 9.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 9.5 0 1843.08 3 +3
    Extra 300L YR-EWF 8.50 7.69 7.23 7.39 8.14 7.93 7.64 8.61 8.12 6.04 9.59   1806.48    
7 Tomasz Malec - POL 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 8.5 0 1727.17 7
    Extra 330SC SP-RAY 7.56 7.10 7.89 7.28 7.41 7.25 7.64 8.05 6.79 6.04 8.50   1759.20    
8 Jan Sobotka - CZE 8.5 8.0 6.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 0 1703.72 8
    Sukhoi 29 OK-HXA 8.83 8.14 5.33 7.56 7.23 8.05 6.83 7.64 7.25 7.19 7.95   1719.30    
9 Laszlo Baku Jr. - HUN 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 7.5 0 1638.58 11 -2
    Extra 300 D-EEXT 7.56 7.10 6.70 7.19 8.14 7.64 7.89 6.74 5.89 6.83 7.40   1701.38    
10 Andres Ratsepp - EST 8.5 7.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 8.5 7.5 7.0 8.5 0 1680.47 10
    Extra NG ES-RZM 8.03 6.51 7.23 7.39 6.79 6.91 5.75 8.17 7.41 7.19 8.50   1692.32    
11 Jakub Mekota - CZE 8.0 8.5 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.5 0 1686.06 9 +2
    Extra 300L YL-VUP 8.12 8.82 6.51 7.56 7.23 6.74 7.72 7.16 7.25 7.19 7.40   1635.76    
12 Pierluigi Zito - ITA 7.0 6.0 7.5 6.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 HZ 7.0 1 1489.93 13 -1
    CAP 231 D-EBDT 6.62 5.33 7.41 6.91 7.72 7.46 7.89 7.39 6.69 4.96 6.86   1611.63    
13 Janos Sonkoly - HUN 8.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 4.0 6.0 7.5 0 1618.29 12 +1
    Extra 300 D-EEXT 7.56 7.10 7.41 7.76 6.79 6.17 7.89 7.39 5.20 5.94 7.40   1609.07    
14 Jan Valasek - CZE 7.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 8.0 7.5 Lo 4.0 7.0 6.0 0.0 8.0 1 1468.01 14
    Zlin 50LX OK-SPR 7.41 7.46 6.51 5.68 7.89 7.39 6.73 6.69 6.57 0.00 7.95   1542.05    
15 Lukas Ponizil - CZE 8.0 7.0 6.5 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 8.5 0 1433.80 15
    Zlin 50LX OK-SPR 8.12 6.79 5.92 4.74 6.57 6.74 6.83 4.80 5.20 4.90 8.50   1484.70    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0   14
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 50 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark 1 2  
 Lo to Mark 1 11  
 Hi to Mark - 3  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 5 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Ch.Judge
Jan Valasek - CZE Fig-7 7.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 Lo 4.0 6.5 7.5 OK
  Zlin 50LX OK-SPR   6.97 7.16 6.41 6.03 6.73 6.79 7.05  
Pierluigi Zito - ITA Fig-10 6.0 5.0 4.0 Lo 0.0 HZ 3.0 7.0 OK
  CAP 231 D-EBDT   5.75 5.57 4.35 4.96 4.96 3.96 6.23  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7.57, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.71 Panel average mark = 7.47, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1.75
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge raw
Norm score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Jakub Mekota - CZE Extra 300L 1686.06 -   1635.76 50.30     9     11     + 2     0.60 25.90%
Madalin Girbea - ROU Extra 300L 1843.08 -   1806.48 36.60     3     6     + 3     0.28 11.90%
Laszlo Baku Jr. - HUN Extra 300 1638.58 -   1701.38 62.80     11     9     - 2     0.27 11.70%
Pierluigi Zito - ITA CAP 231 1489.93 -   1611.63 121.70     13     12     - 1     0.27 11.40%
Janos Sonkoly - HUN Extra 300 1618.29 -   1609.07 9.22     12     13     + 1     0.19 8.10%
Octavian Stavila - ROU Extra 330SC 1943.98 -   1861.69 82.29     1     2     + 1     0.18 7.80%
Mircea Olteanu - ROU Extra 300L 1805.47 -   1845.81 40.34     5     4     - 1     0.17 7.40%
Maksym Grabarczyk - POL Extra 330SC 1802.86 -   1841.57 38.71     6     5     - 1     0.17 7.10%
Lucian Dragus - ROU Extra 330SC 1838.14 -   1855.06 16.92     4     3     - 1     0.11 4.70%
Mihnea Istrate - ROU Extra 300L 1924.00 -   1869.93 54.07     2     1     - 1     0.09 3.90%
                  2.33    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Tomasz Malec - POL Extra 330SC 1727.17   1759.20 32.03     7     7            
Jan Sobotka - CZE Sukhoi 29 1703.72   1719.30 15.58     8     8            
Andres Ratsepp - EST Extra NG 1680.47   1692.32 11.85     10     10            
Jan Valasek - CZE Zlin 50LX 1468.01   1542.05 74.04     14     14            
Lukas Ponizil - CZE Zlin 50LX 1433.80   1484.70 50.90     15     15            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0.60

 Min = -0.27 Average = 0.17
Panel:

= 2.33

 = -3.75  = -0.71
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg ITA x 1 POL x 2 HUN x 2 EST x 1 ROU x 5 CZE x 4 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (non-scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 25/08/26